<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=134132097137679&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

Pixalate Unveils Q3 2025 EMEA Ad Viewability Benchmarks: 70% Mobile App Viewability in the UK, Germany Sees 57% on Mobile Web; Netherlands at 71% on Desktop Web

Nov 11, 2025 10:00:00 AM

According to Pixalate's research on Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA) programmatic ad viewability across desktop web, mobile web, and mobile apps, Ukraine had 56% mobile app ad viewability; Israel had 75% mobile app ad viewability

LONDON, November 12, 2025 -- Pixalate, a leading global platform for ad fraud protection, privacy, and compliance analytics, today released the Q3 2025 EMEA Programmatic Ad Viewability Benchmarks for the UK, France, Spain, Ukraine, Israel, Netherlands, and Germany. The reports analyze the percentage of programmatic advertisements that were viewable across desktop web, mobile web, and mobile in-app programmatic advertising ecosystems.

In addition to the UK, France, Ukraine, Israel, the Netherlands, and Germany reports, Pixalate released Q3 2025 Ad Viewability Benchmarks by country for the United States (U.S.), Canada, Brazil, and India.

EMEA Viewability Trends

Ukraine

Platform Viewability
Mobile In-App 56%
Mobile Web 54%
Desktop Web  54%

 

Netherlands

Mobile In-App 52%
Mobile Web 72%
Desktop Web 71%

 

United Kingdom

Mobile In-App 70%
Mobile Web 66%
Desktop Web 63%

 

France

Mobile In-App 67%
Mobile Web 49%
Desktop Web 68%

 

Germany

Mobile In-App 65%
Mobile Web 57%
Desktop Web 63%

 

Israel

Mobile In-App 75%
Mobile Web 64%
 Desktop Web 55%

 

By global regions

Desktop web ad viewability benchmarks

  • Global: 63%
  • APAC: 61%
  • EMEA: 62%
  • LATAM: 65%
  • North America: 63%

Mobile web ad viewability benchmarks

  • Global: 60%
  • APAC: 60%
  • EMEA: 62%
  • LATAM: 61%
  • North America: 60%

Mobile app ad viewability benchmarks

  • Global: 67%
  • APAC: 58%
  • EMEA: 64%
  • LATAM: 67%
  • North America: 72%


Pixalate’s data science team analyzed programmatic advertising activity across 39 billion global open programmatic advertising impressions in Q3 2025 to compile this research. Pixalate's datasets, used exclusively to derive these insights, consist predominantly of buy-side open-auction programmatic traffic sources.

Download all of Pixalate’s Q3 2025: Programmatic Ad Viewability Benchmark Reports by Country

 

About Pixalate

Pixalate is a global platform specializing in privacy compliance, ad fraud prevention, and digital ad supply chain data intelligence. Founded in 2012, Pixalate is trusted by regulators, data researchers, advertisers, publishers, ad tech platforms, and financial analysts across the Connected TV (CTV), mobile app, and website ecosystems. Pixalate is accredited by the MRC for the detection and filtration of Sophisticated Invalid Traffic (SIVT).  pixalate.com

Disclaimer

The content of this press release, and the Q3 2025 Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA) Programmatic Ad Viewability Benchmark Reports (the "Reports"), reflect Pixalate's opinions with respect to factors that Pixalate believes may be useful to the digital media industry. Any data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate's opinions are just that, opinions, which means that they are neither facts nor guarantees. Pixalate is sharing this data not to impugn the standing or reputation of any entity, person or app, but, instead, to report findings and trends pertaining to programmatic advertising activity across in the time period studied. Per the Media Rating Council (MRC), “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.” Where the traffic characteristics are suggestive of deliberate intent to mislead, such IVT is often referred to as “ad fraud.” Also per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes.”


Search Blog

Follow Pixalate

Subscribe to our blog

*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Subscribe to our blog

*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.