According to new research from Pixalate, 88% of likely child-directed apps with ads share personal information in the advertising bid stream; 191 apps failed to provide the requisite ‘children’s privacy’ disclosure as specified under the COPPA Rule
LONDON, August 14, 2025 – Pixalate, the global market-leading ad fraud protection, privacy, and compliance analytics platform, today released the Q2 2025 State Of Children’s Privacy On Mobile Apps Report, part of its COPPA Violation Risks in Mobile Apps series.
The analysis reveals significant privacy gaps found in mobile apps available to download on Google Play Store and Apple App Store, potentially violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) by unlawfully collecting, using and sharing children’s personal information in the advertising bid stream.
Pixalate’s data science and legal teams evaluated 24,561 mobile apps classified as likely child-directed pursuant to Pixalate’s COPPA Methodology, and identified 240 U.S.-registered, advertising-enabled apps (e.g., with app-ads.txt, open programmatic ad traffic) that are likely violating COPPA, placing the online privacy and safety of up to 15 million lifetime app users– majority likely children–in jeopardy.
The COPPA Rule regulates the online collection of personal information from children under 13 years old. Under COPPA guidelines, personal information encompasses individually identifiable data collected online, including:
Rank |
App |
Developer |
Developer Country |
Lifetime App Users (US) |
1 |
XIMAD, Inc. |
UNITED STATES |
1.2M |
|
2 |
Blue Ox Family Games, Inc. |
UNITED STATES |
596K |
|
3 |
Blue Ox Family Games, Inc. |
UNITED STATES |
139K |
|
4 |
XIMAD, Inc. |
UNITED STATES |
106K |
|
5 |
MinoMonsters Inc. |
UNITED STATES |
98K |
Rank |
App |
Developer |
Developer Country |
Lifetime App Users (US) |
1 |
StartourMobs |
UNITED STATES |
1.9M |
|
2 |
ZiMAD |
UNITED STATES |
1.9M |
|
3 |
Blue Ox Family Games, Inc. |
UNITED STATES |
902K |
|
4 |
Kayen Works |
UNITED STATES |
852K |
|
5 |
Platonic Games |
UNITED STATES |
774K |
Pixalate’s data science and legal teams analyzed 24,561 mobile devices using the following criteria:
For the complete list and the methodology, download the report here:
*References to ‘without a privacy policy/policies’ or ‘no detected/detectable privacy policy/policies’ imply that Pixalate’s proprietary systems were unable to detect or identify a purported privacy policy/notice URL at the time of crawling the App Stores pursuant to Pixalate’s proprietary privacy policy detection and classification system. Based on Pixalate’s methodology and analysis, all of the identified apps generally exhibit characteristics aligned with the child-directed factors under the COPPA Rule, suggesting that these apps likely appeal to, or may predominantly be used by, children.
**References to advertising-enabled mobile apps, or apps with ads are those that have open programmatic advertising traffic, with ad impressions targeted towards United States based consumers at the time of crawling.
To learn more, please review the report’s methodology.
About Pixalate
Pixalate is a global platform specializing in privacy compliance, ad fraud prevention, and digital ad supply chain data intelligence. Founded in 2012, Pixalate is trusted by regulators, data researchers, advertisers, publishers, ad tech platforms, and financial analysts across the Connected TV (CTV), mobile app, and website ecosystems. Pixalate is accredited by the MRC for the detection and filtration of Sophisticated Invalid Traffic (SIVT). pixalate.com
Disclaimer
The content of this press release, and the Q2 2025 State of Children’s Privacy on Mobile Apps Report (the ‘report’) - including all content set forth herein, reflect Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry, inclusive of advertisers, advertising technology companies, developers of mobile applications, professional advisors, non-governmental entities, and regulators. Pixalate is sharing this report’s data–and opinions relating thereto–not to impugn the standing or reputation of any entity, person, or app, but, instead, to report opinions and suggest trends pertaining certain apps available for download via the Apple App Store & Google Play Store during the time period studied. Any data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that, opinions, which means that they are neither facts nor guarantees.
It is important to note that the mere fact that an app appears to be directed to children or is deemed likely child-directed (e.g., data subjects under 13 years of age, as defined by COPPA), does not mean that any such app, or its operator, is failing to comply with COPPA. Further, with respect to apps that appear to be directed to children and have characteristics that, in Pixalate’s opinion, may trigger related privacy obligations and/or risk, such assertions reflect Pixalate’s opinions (i.e., they are neither facts nor guarantees); and, although Pixalate’s methodologies used to render such opinions are derived from automated processing, which at times is coupled with human intervention, no assurances can be – or are – given by Pixalate with respect to the accuracy of any such opinions.
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
These Stories on Mobile Apps
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.
Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”