---
title: "The state of viewability in programmatic: Q2 2018"
description: Pixalate is continuing its analysis of the state of traffic quality in programmatic in Q2 2018 with a look at viewability rates across desktops, smartphones, and tablets across North America.
image: https://www.pixalate.com/hubfs/Blog_Media/Blog%20photos/blog-state-of-viewability-q2-2018.png
---

[![pixalate-full-logo](https://www.pixalate.com/hs-fs/hubfs/Pixalate_Logos/pixalate-full-logo.jpg?width=150&height=60&name=pixalate-full-logo.jpg "pixalate-full-logo")](https://www.pixalate.com)

Search

**Menu**

** **

![](https://www.pixalate.com/hubfs/Blog_Media/Blog%20photos/blog-state-of-viewability-q2-2018.png)

[Mobile](https://www.pixalate.com/blog/topic/mobile) | [Thought Leadership](https://www.pixalate.com/blog/topic/thought-leadership) | [Research Reports](https://www.pixalate.com/blog/topic/research-reports) |

 5 min read

# The state of viewability in programmatic: Q2 2018

 Written by [Pixalate](https://www.pixalate.com/blog/author/pixalate)

 Jul 31, 2018 9:30:00 AM

Pixalate is continuing its analysis of the state of traffic quality in programmatic in Q2 2018 with a look at viewability rates across desktops, smartphones, and tablets across North America. You can download our comprehensive [Q2 2018 Programmatic Quality Report](https://info.pixalate.com/q2-2018-programmatic-traffic-quality-report) here.

Per the Media Rating Council (MRC) standard, an ad is considered “viewable” if at least 50% of its pixels are in-view for at least 1 continuous second (or 2 continuous seconds for video). You can learn more about the standard [here](https://blog.pixalate.com/mrc-viewability-standards-definition-history).

According to a 2017 World Federation of Advertisers (WFA) [study](https://www.wfanet.org/news-centre/global-viewability-improves-for-video-but-display-lags/), display viewability rates (globally) were just under 50%. It is important to note, however, that viewability rates can fluctuate on a quarter-to-quarter or even month-to-month basis. Pixalate will continue to track these trends.

Pixalate examined display ad viewability rates, as well as ad share of voice (“SOV”), on desktop, smartphone, and tablet devices across common publisher categories to compile this research. Invalid traffic (“IVT”) was removed prior to measurement.

### **Desktop: 5 leading categories in ad SOV also lead the way in viewability**

 

On desktop devices, the News & Media publisher category had by far the highest display ad SOV, at 41.1%. The next-closest publisher category was Entertainment, with 13% SOV.

Society & Culture (10.1% SOV), Recreation (9.3%), and Computers & Internet (8.1%) rounded out the top five desktop categories in terms of SOV. Overall, these five publisher categories accounted for just over 81% of the programmatic display ad marketplace on desktop devices.

Interestingly, these five categories were also the top five categories in terms of display ad viewability. All five categories had a viewability rate of at least 57.5%. Every other desktop publisher category had a viewability rate of 50.1% or below.

It’s good news that the five biggest categories in terms of ad volume are also the five leading categories in terms of viewability. It means the bulk of desktop display ads have a viewability rate of at least 57% — well above the average cited in the WFA [study](https://www.wfanet.org/news-centre/global-viewability-improves-for-video-but-display-lags/) from 2017.

However, it’s likely not a coincidence that categories that have high viewability rates also have high ad volume. Many marketers today seek inventory with high in-view rates, which will naturally cause them to favor publisher categories that offer above-average viewability.

From the publishers’ perspective, if they have high traffic — and high ad volume — they are more incentivized to place their inventory above the fold or in other places that are likely to generate a strong viewability rate because higher viewability typically equates to bigger CPMs.

### **Smartphone: Users seek entertainment on the mobile web**

 

The News & Media publisher category had the highest ad SOV for smartphone web display advertising, at 42.7%. This is comparable to the News & Media category SOV for desktop display (41.1%).

Entertainment (20.7%), Society & Culture (10.7%), Reference (7.1%), and Computers & Internet (6.2%) were the top five publisher categories in SOV. Overall, these five categories accounted for over 87% of smartphone web display advertising SOV.

Similar to what we saw for desktop display advertising, these five categories also had high viewability rates. In fact, four of these five categories (all except Reference) ranked in the top five in terms of viewability for smartphone web display advertising.

Society & Culture (50.7%) and News & Media (50.7%) ranked first and second, respectively, in viewability. Computers & Interest (48.8%) was fourth, while Entertainment (48.7%) was fifth.

Only two of these leading categories for smartphone web display advertising registered viewability rates over 50%. This is notably lower than viewability rates for top desktop categories. It’s an important reminder that if you are buying cross-device, viewability rates can greatly differ.

Another interesting takeaway from the smartphone data, in comparison to the desktop data: The ad SOV for the Entertainment category is significantly higher on smartphones (20.7%) compared to desktops (13%).

It’s not a surprise that people want to be entertained when on their smartphones, but this data indicates that smartphone entertainment is not just found within apps — it has extended to the mobile web as well.

### **Tablet: News & Media accounts for nearly half of ad SOV — and it has the highest viewability rate**

 

The News & Media publisher category had the highest ad SOV for tablet web display advertising, at nearly 50%. The News & Media category easily had the highest ad SOV across desktops, smartphones, and tablets.

Entertainment (17.4%), Society & Culture (12%), Recreation (6%), and Business & Economy (5.5%) were the top five publisher categories in SOV. Overall, these five categories accounted for over 90% of tablet web display advertising SOV.

Not only does the News & Media category account for nearly half of tablet display web advertising, but it also has the highest viewability rate on tablets, at 54.7%.

The same can't be said for the Business & Economy category, which has the lowest viewability rate among all categories (35.2%). So far in this study, we have found that publisher categories that have a high ad SOV tend to also have high viewability rates, but the Business & Economy category on tablets breaks the mold.

### **When it comes to viewability rates based on publisher category, there is strong correlation across devices**

 

Pixalate examined viewability rates across various publisher categories on desktops, smartphones, and tablets to see how the rates compare based on category and device. What we discovered is that if a category is high-ranking in viewability on one device, odds are it will rank similarly on another device.

That’s not to say, however, that the device type doesn’t matter. For example, desktop devices had a very wide range in viewability based on publisher category, with the highest category registering an in-view rate of 66% and the lowest category at just 32% — less than half the amount. Smartphones and tablets did not have nearly as wide of a range.

### **Recommendations for marketers**

Here are some ways marketers can put this viewability and category ad SOV data to use:

- **Work with a partner that can measure viewability — and IVT — across devices. **Marketers need to know their viewability rates, and all marketers are trying to reach their audiences across devices. It’s important to work with an accredited viewability measurement partner that can accurately detect in-view ads across all screens.

Importantly, your viewability measurement partner must also be able to detect invalid traffic (“IVT”) across devices, as IVT can have a significant impact on viewability rates. The data shared in this post reflects viewability rates after IVT has been removed. If your viewability vendor is not accredited for IVT detection and filtration, then there’s a chance the viewability rates you receive are artificially inflated.

- **Achieve your viewability goals. **Are you attempting to achieve a specific viewability rate, but you keep falling short? It’s possible you aren’t active enough in publisher verticals that provide high viewability levels. This data can be used to make sure ad spend is optimized while achieving high viewability rates.

- **Adjust floor and ceiling CPMs for specific verticals. **Buyers can make their budgets go further by adjusting floor and ceiling CPMs for specific verticals. Viewability is viewed as a currency in today’s programmatic marketplace, and it’s up to each marketer to determine how much value they place in a viewable ad.

Download the full [Q2 2018 Programmatic Quality Report](https://info.pixalate.com/q2-2018-programmatic-traffic-quality-report) here.

[![ads-txt-2017-trends-report](https://no-cache.hubspot.com/cta/default/2364596/f41c6183-ecbd-4d7a-9e0d-cb658a0c57b0.png)](https://cta-redirect.hubspot.com/cta/redirect/2364596/f41c6183-ecbd-4d7a-9e0d-cb658a0c57b0)

### **Methodology**

Pixalate analyzed billions of programmatic advertising impressions throughout April 2018 to compile the research contained herein. Pixalate utilized its proprietary algorithms to measure viewability levels across devices and channels. This data represents the North American programmatic marketplace. Geography is based on the User Pool (IP) and not the region of the domain. Categories of domains that had less than 100,000 impressions were removed from this study. The ad Share of Voice (“SOV”) is based off the remaining categories. Invalid traffic (“IVT”) was removed prior to measurement.

### **About Pixalate**

Pixalate is a cross-channel fraud intelligence company that works with brands and platforms to prevent invalid traffic and improve ad inventory quality.

### Search Blog

Search

### Follow Pixalate

<https://twitter.com/pixalateinc> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/pixalate> <https://www.facebook.com/pixalate>

### Subscribe to our blog

*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our [Terms of Use ](https://www.pixalate.com/terms)and [Privacy Policy.](https://www.pixalate.com/privacypolicy)

Previous Story

[← Pixalate Week in Review: July 23 - 27, 2018](https://www.pixalate.com/blog/programmatic-ad-fraud-news-week-in-review-july-27-2018)

[** ](https://www.pixalate.com/blog)

Next Story

[Pixalate Week in Review: July 30 - August 3, 2018 →](https://www.pixalate.com/blog/programmatic-ad-fraud-news-week-in-review-august-3-2018)

## You May Also Like

These Stories on Mobile

[![](https://www.pixalate.com/hubfs/Blog%20Media/2026%20Covers%20and%20Images/OpenEPG%20landing%20page%20hero%20image.png) ](https://www.pixalate.com/blog/pixalate-launches-openepg-1.0-analytics-to-bring-linear-tv-grade-measurement-verification-to-open-programmatic-ctv)

[Mobile](https://www.pixalate.com/blog/topic/mobile)

### [Pixalate Launches OpenEPG™ 1.0 Analytics to Bring Linear TV-Grade Measurement & Verification to Open Programmatic CTV; OpenEPG DB™ Unlocks 12,875 Shows From 318 Channels Using Bidstream Bundle ID](https://www.pixalate.com/blog/pixalate-launches-openepg-1.0-analytics-to-bring-linear-tv-grade-measurement-verification-to-open-programmatic-ctv)

 Jun 16, 2026 8:33:30 AM |

 5 min read

[![](https://www.pixalate.com/hubfs/Blog%20Media/2026%20Covers%20and%20Images/United%20States%20%26%20GLOBAL%20-%20IVT%20Benchmarks%20-%20Q1%202026.png) ](https://www.pixalate.com/blog/q1-2026-ad-fraud-benchmarks-report-for-north-america)

[Mobile](https://www.pixalate.com/blog/topic/mobile)

### [Pixalate Releases Q1 2026 North America Invalid Traffic (IVT) & Ad Fraud Benchmarks: United States Mobile Apps See 32% Invalid Traffic (IVT) Rate](https://www.pixalate.com/blog/q1-2026-ad-fraud-benchmarks-report-for-north-america)

 Apr 29, 2026 8:00:01 AM |

 2 min read

[![](https://www.pixalate.com/hubfs/Blog%20Media/2026%20Covers%20and%20Images/UNITED%20KINGDOM%20%26%20GERMANY%20%26%20GLOBAL%20-%20IVT%20Benchmarks%20-%20Q1%202026.png) ](https://www.pixalate.com/blog/q1-2026-ad-fraud-benchmarks-report-for-emea)

[Mobile](https://www.pixalate.com/blog/topic/mobile)

### [Pixalate Releases Q1 2026 EMEA Invalid Traffic (IVT) & Ad Fraud Benchmarks: United Kingdom Connected TV (CTV) Most at Risk with 46% IVT Rate](https://www.pixalate.com/blog/q1-2026-ad-fraud-benchmarks-report-for-emea)

 Apr 29, 2026 8:00:00 AM |

 2 min read

**

### Subscribe to our blog

*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our [Terms of Use ](https://www.pixalate.com/terms)and [Privacy Policy.](https://www.pixalate.com/privacypolicy)

![pixalate-logo-red-small](https://www.pixalate.com/hs-fs/hubfs/2018NewTemplate/pixalate-logo-red-small.png?width=208&name=pixalate-logo-red-small.png "pixalate-logo-red-small")

**

 By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our [Terms of Use](https://www.pixalate.com/terms) and [Privacy Policy](https://www.pixalate.com/privacypolicy)

Products

[Analytics](https://www.pixalate.com/products/analytics) [Blocking](https://www.pixalate.com/products/blocking) [Media Rating Terminal](https://www.pixalate.com/products/mrt) [Publisher Trust Indexes](https://www.pixalate.com/rankings/?group=app&reportId=publisherTrustIndex) [Seller Trust Indexes](https://www.pixalate.com/rankings/?group=app&reportId=publisherTrustIndex) [IoT Device Rankings](https://www.pixalate.com/rankings/?group=app&reportId=iotDeviceReach)

Resources

[Blog](https://blog.pixalate.com/) [Press](https://www.pixalate.com/press) [Careers](https://www.pixalate.com/jobs) [Team](https://info.pixalate.com/pixalate-leadership-team)

Contact

Email

[** sales@pixalate.com ](mailto:sales@pixalate.com)

[** privacy@pixalate.com ](mailto:privacy@pixalate.com)

US:

[** +1 888 749 2528 ](tel:+1%20888%20749%202528)

EU:

[** +44 (0)800 011 2050 ](tel:+44%20(0)800%20011%202050)

Slack:

[Join ATSAPI Slack Channel ](https://atsapi-pixalate.slack.com/join/shared_invite/zt-10dtow5cj-OEtlNr5yzJkrZMQUqcEEow#/shared-invite/email)

Offices

Global Offices

US

1775 Greensboro Station Place, Suite 425, McLean, VA 22102

UK

20 North Audley Street   
London, W1K 6WE, United Kingdom

EU

10 Earlsfort Terrace   
Dublin 2, D02 T380, Ireland

Singapore

10 Anson Road, #22-02 International Plaza, Singapore 079903

[![facebook](https://www.pixalate.com/hubfs/footer/icons/facebook.png) ](https://www.facebook.com/pixalate) [![x](https://www.pixalate.com/hubfs/footer/icons/twitter-x.png) ](https://twitter.com/pixalateinc) [![linkedin](https://www.pixalate.com/hubfs/footer/icons/linkedin.png) ](https://www.linkedin.com/company/pixalate) ![wechat](https://www.pixalate.com/hubfs/footer/icons/wechat.png) [![slack](https://www.pixalate.com/hubfs/footer/icons/slack.png) ](https://atsapi-pixalate.slack.com/join/shared_invite/zt-10dtow5cj-OEtlNr5yzJkrZMQUqcEEow#/shared-invite/email)

[Terms of Use](https://www.pixalate.com/terms) [Privacy Policy](https://www.pixalate.com/privacypolicy) [GDPR Compliance](https://www.pixalate.com/gdpr) Disclaimer

Copyright © 2025 Pixalate

[Back to top **](https://www.pixalate.com/blog/state-of-viewability-programmatic-q2-2018#)

# Disclaimer

 Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.

 Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”

**

**

*By clicking Download and entering your email address, you are agreeing to our [Terms of Use](https://www.pixalate.com/terms) and have read and acknowledge our [Privacy Policy](https://www.pixalate.com/hubfs/2024-08-20_Pixalate_Privacy_Policy.pdf).

*Copyright © 2025 Pixalate** *

* *

* *

* *

* *

* *

* *

* *

* *

* *

* *

* *

* *

* *

*

×

## Subscribe to the Pixalate Blog

The first step in ad fraud prevention.

Loading...

 By entering your email address and clicking Submit, you are agreeing to our [Terms of Use](https://www.pixalate.com/terms) and [Privacy Policy](https://www.pixalate.com/privacypolicy).

![pixalate-logo-white](https://www.pixalate.com/hubfs/Blog_V2_08_26_2016/logo/Pixalate_Logo_WHITE.png)

##### Contact Us12

Loading...

![pixalate-logo-white](https://www.pixalate.com/hubfs/Blog_V2_08_26_2016/logo/Pixalate_Logo_WHITE.png)

##### Download GSTI

Loading...

Schedule your demo today

Please complete all fields

Loading...

By entering your email address and clicking Submit, you are agreeing to our [Terms of Use](https://www.pixalate.com/terms) and [Privacy Policy](https://www.pixalate.com/privacypolicy).

*

* *

*

*